Thousands of workers in the greater Washington, D.C. and Baltimore region were exposed, through their occupations, to hazardous asbestos dust. Many of these workers developed respiratory ailments and cancers of the lung and chest, including mesothelioma. Even household members of these workers have occasionally developed mesothelioma because the worker unknowingly exposed his family by carrying toxic asbestos dust home on his clothing. Many of the companies that manufactured and sold the asbestos products routinely failed to warn the workers of the presence of asbestos in their products or the magnitude of the danger it posed, despite having knowledge of the hazard.
Asbestos litigation is a highly specialized field of product liability law, requiring familiarity with the complex medical and industrial hygiene issues that surface in virtually every case. Our lawyers have over 20 years of experience representing the rights of asbestos victims. Contact us so that we can help you and your family get the information you need to make the decisions that will work best for you.
Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer caused primarily by asbestos exposure. Maryland has a long history of industries such as shipbuilding, construction, and manufacturing, which unfortunately used asbestos extensively. This has led to higher-than-average cases of asbestos-related illnesses, including mesothelioma, among workers and their families.
At Brown Kiely, LLP, we recognize the devastating impact of mesothelioma on victims and their loved ones. Our team is dedicated to helping Maryland residents who have been affected by this disease pursue justice and the compensation they deserve. Whether you were directly exposed to asbestos at work or through secondary exposure at home, we are here to help.
Mesothelioma develops in the thin layer of tissue covering certain internal organs, most commonly the lungs (pleural mesothelioma). Its symptoms often appear decades after exposure to asbestos, making diagnosis and treatment particularly challenging. Common symptoms include shortness of breath, chest pain, and persistent coughing. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it’s crucial to act quickly to explore your legal options.
In Maryland, asbestos exposure often occurred in workplaces such as:
Even family members of workers could be exposed through asbestos fibers brought home on clothing or equipment.
Mesothelioma is most commonly associated with occupational exposure to asbestos. Industries that have historically had a higher risk of asbestos exposure and, consequently, a higher incidence of mesothelioma diagnoses include:
It’s important to note that while these industries have historically had higher rates of asbestos exposure, asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma can also affect individuals who had non-occupational exposure through activities such as home renovations, using asbestos-containing products, or living near asbestos-related industries.
Asbestos was commonly used in a wide range of products and materials due to its heat-resistant and insulating properties. While the use of asbestos has significantly declined in many parts of the world due to its associated health risks, it can still be found in some older products and materials. Here are some examples of products and materials that may contain asbestos:
Filing a mesothelioma claim can provide much-needed financial compensation to cover medical treatments, lost wages, and emotional suffering. At Brown Kiely, LLP, we specialize in asbestos litigation and have successfully represented numerous mesothelioma clients in Maryland.
Our team investigates every case thoroughly to identify liable parties, including asbestos manufacturers, employers, or property owners who failed to protect workers and their families. We understand the legal landscape and can guide you through the process of filing a claim, negotiating settlements, or taking your case to court if necessary.
Asbestos is a mineral mined from the earth. Major asbestos deposits are located in Canada, South Africa, Russia, and the United States. Asbestos is no longer mined in the United States, but asbestos was once mined in Vermont, California, and other states. The three major types of asbestos used commercially in the U.S. were chrysotile (white), amosite (brown), and crocidolite (blue). Exposure to any of these commercial fibers can cause serious illness or death.
Asbestos fibers are very strong and heat resistant. As a result asbestos was used in hundreds of commercial, industrial, and household products, ranging from building materials such as insulation, refractory materials, and fireproofing, to friction products such as brakes and clutches, to household products such as hair dryers and portable heaters.
The use of asbestos is banned in many industrialized nations. And fortunately, many asbestos products are banned in the U.S., including drywall joint compound, spray fireproofing, preformed pipe insulation and block insulation, corrugated paper, rollboard, and flooring felt. Remarkably, however, asbestos use is still permitted in limited applications in the United States. Most asbestos imported into the U.S. today is used in the chlor-alkali industry, a part of the chemical industry that makes chlorine and sodium hydroxide. Some asbestos is also still used in roofing products.
The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration has stated: “OSHA is aware of no instance in which exposure to a toxic substance has more clearly demonstrated detrimental health effects on humans than has asbestos exposure.” While heavier exposures to asbestos can significantly increase health risks, the National Cancer Institute recognizes that asbestos-related diseases have been found in individuals with only brief exposures to asbestos.
When asbestos products are disturbed, tiny asbestos fibers are released into the air, where they can be inhaled. Once inhaled, the fibers can become trapped in the lung tissue. The three most common types of disease that result from asbestos exposure are asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.
Asbestosis is a scarring of the lungs that can result in chronic shortness of breath, cough, and lung damage that can occasionally progress to a terminal condition.
Lung cancer can be caused by asbestos exposure by itself, or in conjunction with cigarette smoking, which has a synergistic effect on the development of the tumor.
Mesothelioma is a rare cancer of the lining of the lung, chest wall, or peritoneum. Asbestos exposure is the only known cause of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is an aggressive tumor for which there is no known cure. Surgery or clinical trials may be available for certain patients who qualify. A mesothelioma patient should work carefully with his or her physician to explore possible treatment options.
When a physician suspects a patient may have mesothelioma, the most common question asked of the patient is “Did you ever work with asbestos?” Individuals who worked in the construction trade in the 1960’s through the 1970’s are frequently able to answer this question in the affirmative. Similarly, people who worked in shipyards or served in the Navy can easily recall work with or around asbestos containing materials. However, often people are exposed to asbestos in ways they did not realize. For example, many do-it-yourself homeowners installed drywall in their homes during the 1960’s and 1970’s. Much of the drywall joint compound contained asbestos in that period. Similarly, many people changed their own car brakes, which contained asbestos up until the 1980’s. Other exposures are less obvious, as hundreds of household and building products contained asbestos, often without any warning label alerting the user to the hazard. The lawyers at Brown Kiely have represented hundreds of asbestos clients, spanning many different occupations. We have also represented women and children who have suffered from mesothelioma as a result of “take home” exposure from a spouse or family member.
Some of the more common occupational exposures to asbestos occurred in the following types of employment:
The time limit to file a law suit, called a “statute of limitation”, can depend on several factors, including, but not limited to, the state in which you want to file your claim. Each asbestos case has its own statute of limitation, which typically starts to run from the time the injured person knows, or should have known, that his injury was caused by asbestos exposure. It is important that you speak with an attorney as soon as possible (whether it’s us or someone else) so that the attorney can determine how much time you have to file your claim.
There is a common misperception that asbestos claims are part of either an ongoing class action lawsuit, or that there was a historic class action and now it is too late to file a claim. There are no asbestos injury class action cases pending, and historical efforts to create a class action have failed. It is not too late to file a claim, provided the claim is brought within the statute of limitations. Each case has its own statute of limitations, meaning the time in which to file the case from the time a person knows or should know that his injury is caused by asbestos exposure.
While there are no asbestos injury class actions, occasionally cases will proceed to court in a consolidated fashion in an effort to promote efficiency. In these consolidations, a handful or large group of cases are bundled together for consideration in front of the same judge and jury.
Over the years, many of the manufacturers of asbestos containing products have filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection (starting with Johns-Manville) as a tool to get out of ongoing liability to asbestos victims. Generally, as part of the bankruptcy reorganization, the Bankruptcy Court requires the company that made the asbestos products, and/or its insurers, to establish a trust fund designed to compensate victims of exposure to that particular company’s asbestos products. Once the company emerges from bankruptcy, as a general rule, it can no longer be sued in court. There is no massive, single fund designed to compensate all asbestos victims. Congress has tried over the years to implement such a system but all such efforts have failed, either because the companies, the insurers or the victims believed the particular bill at issue was unfair.
The TV commercials tout billions of dollars in trust money available to compensate the victims. Unfortunately, many of the trusts are underfunded. Very few trusts pay 100% of the value of a claim. In order to qualify for virtually any of the trusts, the victim must establish a history of exposure to the particular company’s products at certain jobsites, and supply medical evidence of a specific asbestos-related disease. The compensation available to the victim depends on the disease process. Generally, mesothelioma claims receive the highest compensation levels, then lung cancer cases, then other asbestos-related cancers, and then non-malignant asbestos diseases. The claim may be rejected by the trust for a variety of reasons, and the claimant can then supplement his submission. Certain disputed claims can go to arbitration. Once a claimant is qualified for payment, the victim usually sees a fraction of the expected payout for the claim. This is called the payment percentage of the scheduled value. For example, the Johns-Manville trust currently pays victims about 6 cents on the dollar of the scheduled value. Other trusts offer 10 cents or 20 cents on the dollar of the scheduled value. Even the full scheduled values are generally less than a client would have received if his case was pending in court.
Brown Kiely carefully evaluates each potential asbestos case. As an initial matter, the client must demonstrate a verified asbestos-related disease. In some cases, that involves a simple analysis. For example, mesothelioma is a signature disease for which asbestos is essentially the only known cause. Asbestos-related diseases all share something called a latency period. This is the period of time between exposure to asbestos and the development of disease. Most asbestos-related diseases require a 10 year or greater latency period. In fact, the average latency period for development of mesothelioma is between 30 – 40 years. So a person who was exposed to asbestos last year who now has lung cancer cannot attribute the lung cancer to last year’s exposure. A client must also have a credible historic exposure to asbestos. We work hard with clients to explore all possible sources of asbestos exposure that may have contributed to their disease. Sometimes it is hard to recall the events of 30-40 years ago, and often clients don’t realize that certain products or materials they used contained asbestos. Fortunately, we have an extensive database of asbestos-containing products as well as the locations at which asbestos was used in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metro areas. We have taken on very difficult cases – cases that other firms would not handle – and turned them into success stories for our clients. We are proud of the fact that the majority of our asbestos cases are referred to us by other attorneys who are aware of our track record.
Even though most commercial asbestos use is prohibited in the United States, and has been for decades, there is still a lot of in-place asbestos found in buildings and homes. If a building was constructed prior to 1980, there is a reasonable possibility that asbestos containing building products were used in some fashion in its construction. Older homes occasionally still have asbestos associated with the heating system, including asbestos found on residential boilers or heating pipes. Landlords and homeowners need to be cautious when performing demolition and renovation work so as to avoid disturbing any in-place asbestos. If you have a question about whether a particular material in your home or building contains asbestos, you should contact a certified asbestos inspector, who can remove a bulk sample of the material and have it tested at a certified lab.
The answer is, it depends on the situation and the facts of your case. We will take the time to discuss the particulars of your case so that you can make the best decision on how to move forward.
If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma in Maryland, don’t wait to seek legal assistance. The statute of limitations for filing a claim can vary, so acting promptly is critical. Contact Brown Kiely, LLP for a free consultation to discuss your case and learn about your options for pursuing compensation.
Your fight is our fight. Let us help you secure justice and financial security during this challenging time.
Individuals and families who are facing legal challenges related to asbestos exposure will have questions about what steps to take and what evidence is necessary to build a strong claim. We understand that pursuing justice after an asbestos-related illness can feel overwhelming, which is why we’ve addressed some of the most common questions to help clarify the process. For those seeking experienced guidance, Maryland asbestos lawyers can provide valuable insight and direction.
To prove an asbestos-related claim, establishing a link between exposure to asbestos and the resulting illness is essential. This often involves showing a history of contact with asbestos materials, whether in a work environment, through contaminated products, or secondhand exposure. Witness statements, employment records, and evidence of the presence of asbestos in the environment where exposure occurred can be critical.
Proving a connection between asbestos exposure and an illness like mesothelioma requires medical documentation and expert opinions. Medical professionals can confirm a diagnosis of an asbestos-related condition and link it to known exposure patterns. Additionally, demonstrating that the timeline of exposure aligns with the development of the illness is crucial. To support your case, evidence such as test results, imaging studies, and detailed medical histories can be key.
Our Maryland asbestos lawyers can share that the documentation needed for an asbestos lawsuit typically includes employment records to show where exposure occurred, medical records that confirm the diagnosis, and proof of the use of asbestos-containing materials. Legal teams often recommend keeping any correspondence or documents from employers or manufacturers acknowledging the use of asbestos. Financial records, such as those reflecting medical expenses or lost wages, may also strengthen your claim.
Yes, medical records are one of the most important pieces of evidence in an asbestos-related legal claim. These documents verify the diagnosis and detail the progression of the illness. Pathology reports, biopsy results, and records from treating physicians are often key to showing how the illness was caused by asbestos exposure. Having thorough and accurate medical documentation ensures that the case is supported by clear and factual evidence.
Demonstrating workplace exposure typically involves gathering employment records that confirm your position and job site. Witness testimony from coworkers who experienced similar exposure can add weight to the claim. Additionally, obtaining safety reports or industry documentation proving that asbestos was present in your workplace during your employment period is often essential. These pieces of evidence work together to establish that exposure occurred during the course of your work.
For a smoother process, it’s important to have experienced support when taking legal action for asbestos exposure. If you or a loved one has been affected, Maryland asbestos lawyers can help evaluate your situation and determine the best path forward. Our founding partners each have over 20 years of experience in personal injury law and are committed to supporting our clients when they need it the most. Attorneys like those at Brown Kiely LLP are well-equipped to provide compassionate legal representation. Our team has been representing clients since 1998. Contact their team today to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward justice.
Here is a fact: My family lost our loved one far too early because of a contracted illness. Another fact is that before our loved one left us, he asked Dan to tell his story so others wouldn’t have to suffer in vain. Dan Brown took on this tremendous responsibility and has done so admirably. Dan has been an advocate for my loved one as well as our family.
So how did he do it? The first thing that resonates with Dan is that he is experienced. What comes with that is a network of litigants, practitioners and experts that understand Dan’s methodology of presentation. Secondly, Dan maintains balance through what can be an adversarial legal process. That proves invaluable when the legal system becomes arduous. Lastly, to accomplish what we asked of Dan, he had to become a part of our family. Dan’s obligation to us required that he understand the value of my loved one’s presence in our family. In doing so, there were countless after hour phone calls, as well as impromptu out of state visits. So before we lost our patriarch, we gained a brother.
You’ll find lawyers far and wide who will claim to have subject matter expertise. That very well may or may not be the case. But if and when you need an attorney who’s production is unparalleled over an extensive period of time and who will present your viewpoint to the extent that you are advocated for, your risk of loss is reduced and you maximize the ability to be fairly heard, Dan Brown is clearly the choice for your needs.
Dan Brown’s insightful and tenacious representation was instrumental in helping our firm avoid litigation when we were caught up in a dispute between two very large organizations. Dan did a masterful job in keeping us from being named in the suit/countersuit that cost the involved parties millions of dollars in fees to no real end. We could not be happier with his representation
“The attorneys at this firm are absolutely top-notch! I cannot say enough good things about them. They approach each client with respect, empathy, and professionalism. Each case is thoroughly examined and handled with incredible integrity. The partners’ collective intelligence and knowledge of the law set the highest standard for the entire team. They are very responsive and committed to obtaining the best results for their clients.”
Eser O.
